Hospital admissions due to suicide attempts during the COVID-19 pandemic, a 3-year longitudinal study.

The appearance of the SARS CoV-2 virus and the associated COVID-19 pandemic has been associated with the onset of mental disorders in healthy people and the worsening in those with pre-existing mental conditions. One of the areas that has raised the greatest concern is that of suicidality. Most of the published studies have been carried out cross-sectional or with small samples, without stratifying by age and gender. Thus, the aim of this longitudinal research is to study, in a large population sample of around 6,700,000 inhabitants belonging to the entire region of Madrid (Spain), the admissions in psychiatric hospitalization units due to suicidal attempts along 2019, 2020 and 2021. No clear increase in the number of admissions due to suicidality in the total population have been found. In addition, a higher prevalence in admissions among women is verified. Moreover, stratifying by age and gender, a striking and significant increase in hospital admissions due to suicidality has been observed in the group up to 17 years old, from September 2020 until the end of the study. These results highlight the special vulnerability of children and adolescents, specifically girls, and the need for preventive measures in the face of future pandemics.

Spanish Validation of the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool for Clinical Research Interview for Assessing Patients' Mental Capacity to Consent to Clinical Research.

The aim of the study was to assess a Spanish adaptation of a method that determines the categorical capacity status of potential participants in research projects. The sample consisted of 120 subjects (40 general medicine inpatients, 40 psychiatric inpatients, and 40 healthy controls). The MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool for Clinical Research (MacCAT-CR) interview and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) were used. A feasibility study was carried out and reliability and validity calculations were made against the expert-judgment gold standard. The mean duration of the MacCAT-CR was 13 min. For the MacCAT-CR understanding, appreciation, reasoning, and expressing a choice subscales, the intraclass coefficient correlation (interrater reliability) was .93, .88, .90, and .50, respectively, and internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) was .96, .94, and .95, respectively. Patients considered to be incompetent for expert-judgment obtained lower scores in the MacCAT-CR interview. The Spanish version of the MacCAT-CR is feasible, reliable, and valid for assessing the capacity of patients to give consent in research.

Validación española de la entrevista MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool for Treatment para evaluar la capacidad de los pacientes para consentir tratamiento / Spanish validation of the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool for Treatment interview to assess patients competence to consent treatment

Fundamento y objetivo: Validar al español la entrevista MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool for Treatment (MacCAT-T), que valora la capacidad de los pacientes para consentir tratamiento examinando 4 áreas (comprensión, apreciación, razonamiento y expresión de una elección). Pacientes y método: La muestra se componía de 160 sujetos (80 ingresados en Medicina Interna, 40 ingresados en Psiquiatría y 40 controles sanos). Se utilizaron los instrumentos MacCAT-T y Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Se llevó a cabo un estudio de factibilidad, cálculo de fiabilidad y validez (contragold standard del experto clínico). Resultados: La duración media de la entrevista MacCAT-T fue de 18 min. Respecto a la fiabilidad interobservador, el coeficiente de correlación intraclase fue para Comprensión = 0,98, Apreciación = 0,97, Razonamiento = 0,98 y Expresión de una elección = 0,91. La consistencia interna (alfa de Cronbach) fue: Comprensión = 0,87, Apreciación = 0,76 y Razonamiento = 0,86. Los pacientes considerados incapaces (gold standard) obtienen puntuaciones menores en todas las áreas de la MacCAT-T. Un rendimiento bajo en la MacCAT-T se relaciona con el deterioro cognitivo evaluado por MMSE. Conclusiones: La versión española de la MacCAT-T es fiable, factible y válida para la evaluación de la capacidad de los pacientes para consentir tratamiento (AU)

Background and objective: To validate the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool for Treatment (MacCAT-T) Spanish version, which assesses the mental capacity of patients to consent treatment, by examining 4 areas (Understanding, Appreciation, Reasoning and Expressing a choice). Patients and method: Sample: 160 subjects (80 Internal Medicine inpatients, 40 Psychiatric inpatients and 40 healthy controls). Instruments: MacCAT-T, Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE). Procedure: Feasibility study, reliability and validity calculations (against to gold standard of clinical expert). Results: Mean duration of the MacCAT-T interview was 18 min. Inter-rater reliability: Intraclass correlation coefficient for Understanding = 0.98, Appreciation = 0.97, Reasoning = 0.98, Expressing a choice = 0.91. Internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha): Understanding = 0.87, for Appreciation = 0.76, for Reasoning = 0.86. Patients considered to be incapable (gold standard) scored lower in all the MacCAT-T areas. Poor performance on the MacCAT-T was related to cognitive impairment assessed by MMSE. Conclusions: Spanish version of the MacCAT-T is feasible, reliable, and valid for assessing the capacity of patients to consent treatment (AU)

[Spanish validation of the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool for Treatment interview to assess patients competence to consent treatment]. / Validación española de la entrevista MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool for Treatment para evaluar la capacidad de los pacientes para consentir tratamiento.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To validate the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool for Treatment (MacCAT-T) Spanish version, which assesses the mental capacity of patients to consent treatment, by examining 4 areas (Understanding, Appreciation, Reasoning and Expressing a choice). SAMPLE: 160 subjects (80 Internal Medicine inpatients, 40 Psychiatric inpatients and 40 healthy controls). INSTRUMENTS: MacCAT-T, Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE). PROCEDURE: Feasibility study, reliability and validity calculations (against to gold standard of clinical expert). RESULTS: Mean duration of the MacCAT-T interview was 18min. Inter-rater reliability: Intraclass correlation coefficient for Understanding=0.98, Appreciation=0.97, Reasoning=0.98, Expressing a choice=0.91. Internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha): Understanding=0.87, for Appreciation=0.76, for Reasoning=0.86. Patients considered to be incapable (gold standard) scored lower in all the MacCAT-T areas. Poor performance on the MacCAT-T was related to cognitive impairment assessed by MMSE. CONCLUSIONS: Spanish version of the MacCAT-T is feasible, reliable, and valid for assessing the capacity of patients to consent treatment.

[Brief Suicide Questionnaire. Inter-rater reliability]. / Protocolo breve de evaluación del suicidio: fiabilidad interexaminadores.

INTRODUCTION: Inter-rater agreement is a crucial aspect in the planning and performance of a clinical trial in which the main assessment tool is the clinical interview. The main objectives of this study are to study the inter-rater agreement of a tool for the assessment of suicidal behavior (Brief Suicide Questionnaire) and to examine whether the inter-examiner agreement when multiple ratings are made on a single subject is an efficient method to assess the reliability of an instrument. METHOD: In the context of designing a multicenter clinical trial, 32 psychiatrists assessed a videotaped clinical interview of a patient with suicidal behavior. In order to identify those items in which a greater level of discordance existed and detect the examiners whose ratings differed significantly from the average ratings, we used the DOMENIC method (Detecion of Multiple Examiners Not in Consensus). RESULTS: Inter-rater agreement was between poor (<70%) to excelent (90-100%. Inter-rater agreement in Brugha's list of threatening experiences ranged from 75.5 and 100%; in the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) Scale was 82.58%; in the Beck's Suicidal Intent Scale, ranged from 67.5 and 97%; in the Beck's Scale for Suicide Ideation, ranged from 63.5 and 100%; and in the Lethality Rating Scale was 88.39%. On the whole, the level of agreement among raters, both in general scores and in particular items, was appropriate. CONCLUSION: The proposed design allows the assessment of the inter-rater agreement in an efficient way (only in one session). In addition, regarding the Brief Suicide Questionnaire, inter-raters agreement was appropriate.

Protocolo breve de evaluación del suicidio: fiabilidad interexaminadores / Brief Suicide Questionnaire. Inter-rater reliability

Introducción. El acuerdo entre-examinadores es un aspecto fundamental en la planificación de cualquier trabajo de investigación donde la principal herramienta diagnóstica es la entrevista clínica. El objetivo de este estudio es valorar el acuerdo entre-examinadores de un instrumento de evaluación de la conducta suicida (Protocolo breve de evaluación del suicidio) utilizando las valoraciones de múltiples observadores en una sola sesión. Método. Durante la fase piloto de un estudio clínico multicéntrico centrado en la monitorización de intentos de suicidio, 32 examinadores evaluaron el vídeo de la entrevista clínica a un paciente simulado con conducta suicida. Para identificar los ítems en los que existía una mayor discordancia y a los examinadores cuyo criterio se alejaba más del acuerdo general, se utilizó el método Detection Of Multiple Examiners Not In Consensus (DOMENIC). Resultado. El acuerdo interexaminadores osciló entre pobre (<70%) y excelente (90-100%). En la escala de acontecimientos vitales estresantes el nivel de acuerdo osciló entre 48,4 y 97%; en la escala problemas psicosociales del DSM-IV, entre 75,5 y 100%; en la escala de evaluación de la actividad global fue de 82,58%; en la escala de intencionalidad suicida, osciló entre 67,5 y 97%; en la escala de ideación suicida, entre 63,5 y 100% y en la escala de letalidad del intento de suicidio fue de 88,39%. En general, los examinadores mostraron un nivel de acuerdo adecuado tanto en las puntuaciones globales de cada escala como en cada ítem en particular. Conclusiones. El diseño propuesto permite evaluar el acuerdo entre-examinadores de una forma eficiente (en una única sesión). Además, con respecto al Protocolo breve de evaluación del suicidio, el acuerdo entre-examinadores fue apropiado(AU)

Introduction. Inter-rater agreement is a crucial aspect in the planning and performance of a clinical trial in which the main assessment tool is the clinical interview. The main objectives of this study are to study the inter-rater agreement of a tool for the assessment of suicidal behaviour (Brief Suicide Questionnaire) and to examine whether the inter-examiner agreement when multiple ratings are made on a single subject is an efficient method to assess the reliability of an instrument. Method. In the context of designing a multicenter clinical trial, 32 psychiatrists assessed a videotaped clinical interview of a patient with suicidal behaviour. In order to identify those items in which a greater level of discordance existed and detect the examiners whose ratings differed significantly from the average ratings, we used the DOMENIC method (Detecion of Multiple Examiners Not in Consensus). Results. Inter-rater agreement was between poor (<70%) to excellent (90-100%. Inter-rater agreement in Brugha's list of threatening experiences ranged from 75.5% to 100%; in the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) Scale was 82.58%; in Beck's Suicidal Intent Scale, ranged from 67.5% to 97%; in Beck's Scale for Suicide Ideation, ranged from 63.5% to 100%; and in the Lethality Rating Scale was 88.39%. On the whole, the level of agreement among raters, both in general scores and in particular items, was appropriate. Conclusion. The proposed design allows the assessment of the inter-rater agreement in an efficient way (only in one session). In addition, regarding the Brief Suicide Questionnaire, inter-raters agreement was appropriate(AU)

Differences in maternal and paternal age between schizophrenia and other psychiatric disorders.

Advanced parental age has been shown to increase offspring risk for a number of neuropsychiatric disorders including schizophrenia and Down's syndrome. Other psychiatric disorders have been less studied with respect to the effect of parental age on offspring risk. In this study we examine if advanced parental age increased risk for ICD-10 diagnoses. We hypothesized that advanced parental age would increase risk for offspring psychotic disorders and mental retardation but not other ICD-10 diagnoses. We examined follow-up data for 30,965 subjects treated in outpatient psychiatric facilities between 1980 and 2007. Subjects were younger than 18 years of age at their first outpatient visit. A comparison group was obtained from data on registered births in Spain from 1975. We compared parental age (maternal, paternal, combined) across diagnostic categories using ANOVA and logistic regression was used to estimate the risk of psychopathology in the offspring with advanced parental age (maternal, paternal, combined). Maternal and paternal ages were higher for subjects diagnosed with mental retardation. Risk for psychotic disorders showed a significant linear increase only with advancing maternal age, and not paternal age as is more often reported.

Platelet monoamine oxidase activity in obsessive-compulsive disorder.

Response to SSRIs suggests the implication of the serotonergic system in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). However, biological studies on serotonergic function in OCD have yielded contradictory results. Platelet monoamine oxidase (MAO) activity has been proposed as an index of cerebral serotonin activity. The aim of this study was to examine platelet MAO activity in 29 OCD patients and 29 healthy controls matched by age, sex and tobacco use. We also explored the relationship between platelet MAO activity and aggressive obsessions in OCD patients. There were no differences in platelet MAO activity between OCD patients and healthy controls. We found a significant correlation between platelet MAO activity and Y-BOCS scores in the group of patients with Y-BOCS scores >15. OCD patients with aggressive obsessions had significantly lower levels of platelet MAO activity than patients without aggressive obsessions. Our results suggest that platelet MAO activity may be a marker of OCD severity, and that low platelet MAO activity may be associated with aggressive obsessions in OCD patients.

Perceived quality of life in obsessive-compulsive disorder: related factors.

BACKGROUND: Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) affects young adults and has great impact on the social, emotional and work spheres. METHODS: We measured perceived quality of life (QOL) in OCD patients, in order to analyse socio-demographic and clinical factors that may be associated with QOL perception. 64 OCD outpatients were assessed with the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview for DSM-IV, the Yale-Brown Obsessions and Compulsions scale (Y-BOCS), Hamilton's depression scale and the SF-36 self-administered global QOL perception scale. RESULTS: We found a correlation among Hamilton's scale scores and all SF-36 subscales. The severity of the obsessive-compulsive disorder was correlated with all SF-36 subscales and with the highest scores in Hamilton's scale. The obsessions subscale was correlated to all SF-36 subscales, while the compulsions subscale was correlated only to social functioning, emotional role, mental health and vitality. Compulsions were not related to general health perception. There were significant differences between OCD patients and the Spanish general population in all SF-36 subscales except those related to physical health and pain. Gender, age, age of onset of the disorder, years of evolution and marital status of the patients did not significantly affect quality of life perception. Being employed was related to better scores in the subscale of physical role. Patients with medical comorbidity scored lower in the subscales of general health, social functioning and mental health. Patients with comorbid psychiatric disorders had worse scores in the subscales of pain, general health, social functioning and mental health. CONCLUSION: Quality of life perception was different in OCD patients and the general population. Quality of life perception was related to severity of the disorder, physical and psychiatric comorbidity and employment status.